Listen to this week's show right here.
In a CBA vice-chair election special, we are joined by the two candidates, Mark Fenhalls QC and Paul Keleher QC.
There was no bloodshed in this head-to-head but we think you'll want to hear what both candidates have to say on the wide-ranging topics up for discussion.
We cover everything from "The Deal" to the future use of direct action; from how to stop the slide back into the Bar being for the white, male, middle-class to what the future holds for the Bar in light of the reviews.
We put some of your questions to the two candidates and ask about the very structure of the CBA.
If you are a CBA member, you'll probably want to listen to this in order to help you decide on how to use your vote.
If you are not a CBA member, you might still find this little chat illuminating as to what is the sights of those who will serve initially under Tony Cross QC.
For more information on the candidates and the CBA, please visit their website right here.
PLEASE RATE/REVIEW US: wherever you subscribe, please take two seconds as we start this series, to give us some stars and a few kind words. We'd be e'er so obliged. It helps us get up the search rankings, ya see. If you use iTunes, please click here and it'll take just seconds!
Friday, 25 July 2014
Friday, 18 July 2014
S13E04 - Immigration and Impertinence
Ben Knight
00:01
advocacy, appeals, article 8, Benjamin Knight, european law, Grayling, Gulshan, home office, ian west, immigration, impertinence, Jonathan Holt, LASPO, minimum income requirement, proportionality, rude, rudeness
No comments
Listen to this week's show right here.
We have swapped Kirstin for Jonathan this week as we take on what must be the two biggest immigration cases of the year, MM and PLP vs Grayling - not their official titles!
These cases may be weighty immigration cases but they are important far more broadly as they involve the relationship between the State, Europe and private individuals. They also demonstrate that politics may be getting in the way of good law-making, not for the first time.
Following on from that, we took a look at Re: Ian Stuart West - a case where a friend of our little show appealed a finding a contempt against him and landed-up winning before Sir Brian Leveson, the President of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court. Many have wondered why this Judge should hear this appeal and many lawyers are coming out on both sides of the battle lines on this one. To hear extracts from the spat between Ian and Judge Kelson QC, you need look no further. This is cathartic stuff for many criminal lawyers, faced with an increased feeling of being asked to be complicit in the manipulation of defendants, rather than the representation of them.
In any event, lots to mull over in this week's show so enjoy and get in touch with your views.
PLEASE RATE/REVIEW US: wherever you subscribe, please take two seconds as we start this series, to give us some stars and a few kind words. We'd be e'er so obliged. It helps us get up the search rankings, ya see. If you use iTunes, please click here and it'll take just seconds! Feeding BritCaster.com
Friday, 11 July 2014
S13E03 - Expert Evidence, Unreliable Evidence and Fresh Evidence
Ben Knight
00:01
aequitas, anonymity, appeals, Barristers, BBC, Benjamin Knight, computers, court of appeal, CPS, evidence, FOI, forensics, fresh evidence, glen siddall, hacking, interns, Kirstin Beswick, panorama, rape, sex
No comments
Listen to this week's show right here.
We have talked about expert witnesses many times over the past 12 series but we have seldom explored exactly what an "expert witness" is, what they do, to whom they are accountable, how they are regulated and how they come to be involved in cases.
This week, we fix that by catching-up with Glen Siddall of Aequitas Forensics, Manchester. Glen is an expert in digital forensics and he is instructed by "both sides" in criminal proceedings. We ask him about his work and about recent changes in the world of the expert witness and about hacking Richard Bacon's iPhone.
We also talk to Glen about the recent BBC documentary, Panorama - Justice For Sale? Did the programme accurately reflect his experience of being an expert and does he agree with the conclusions of the journalist and of Timothy Dutton QC, former Chair of the Bar about future regulation?
In the news this week, fresh evidence appeals. We record on the day after a man walks free after being wrongly-convicted of raping his wife multiple times. Fresh evidence emerged that the complainant (who still cannot be named) had lied about the rape, had talked about lying in advance of the trial and seemingly boasted about lying after the event. This is the nightmare scenario that, whilst certainly rare, we would prefer to think never happens. He had been sentenced to 9 years for each count but this was increased to 13 years by the Court of Appeal, following an Attorney-General's Reference.
With that and other matters in our minds, we look at what the Court of Appeal has recently said about fresh evidence and we'll consider whether its approach is consistent.
A little bit of Freedom of Information too, this week. We heard that the CPS was using unpaid students to prepare cases in one of its offices. We asked if this could possibly be true. They answered our FOI request. Is the answer surprising or not?
PLEASE RATE/REVIEW US: wherever you subscribe, please take two seconds as we start this series, to give us some stars and a few kind words. We'd be e'er so obliged. It helps us get up the search rankings, ya see. If you use iTunes, please click here and it'll take just seconds! Feeding BritCaster.com
We have talked about expert witnesses many times over the past 12 series but we have seldom explored exactly what an "expert witness" is, what they do, to whom they are accountable, how they are regulated and how they come to be involved in cases.
This week, we fix that by catching-up with Glen Siddall of Aequitas Forensics, Manchester. Glen is an expert in digital forensics and he is instructed by "both sides" in criminal proceedings. We ask him about his work and about recent changes in the world of the expert witness and about hacking Richard Bacon's iPhone.
We also talk to Glen about the recent BBC documentary, Panorama - Justice For Sale? Did the programme accurately reflect his experience of being an expert and does he agree with the conclusions of the journalist and of Timothy Dutton QC, former Chair of the Bar about future regulation?
In the news this week, fresh evidence appeals. We record on the day after a man walks free after being wrongly-convicted of raping his wife multiple times. Fresh evidence emerged that the complainant (who still cannot be named) had lied about the rape, had talked about lying in advance of the trial and seemingly boasted about lying after the event. This is the nightmare scenario that, whilst certainly rare, we would prefer to think never happens. He had been sentenced to 9 years for each count but this was increased to 13 years by the Court of Appeal, following an Attorney-General's Reference.
With that and other matters in our minds, we look at what the Court of Appeal has recently said about fresh evidence and we'll consider whether its approach is consistent.
A little bit of Freedom of Information too, this week. We heard that the CPS was using unpaid students to prepare cases in one of its offices. We asked if this could possibly be true. They answered our FOI request. Is the answer surprising or not?
PLEASE RATE/REVIEW US: wherever you subscribe, please take two seconds as we start this series, to give us some stars and a few kind words. We'd be e'er so obliged. It helps us get up the search rankings, ya see. If you use iTunes, please click here and it'll take just seconds! Feeding BritCaster.com
Saturday, 5 July 2014
S13E02 - Historic Sexual Offences
Unknown
13:38
BBC, Benjamin Knight, celebrity, children, claimants, constitution, DWP, high court, historic, JSA, Kirstin Beswick, legislation, rape, retrospective, sexual, sexual assault, Sexual offences act 1956, trials, welfare
No comments
Have a listen to this week's show right here.
In the light of the recent verdicts and sentence in Rolph Harris' case, Kirstin goes through the Sexual Offences Act 1956, looking at what offences are contained in it and how amendments have affected the law.
Given that we are on the subject of how the law changes over the years and that retrospective legislation is dangerous territory, we thought it would be worthwhile to take a peek at the decision of the High Court in Reilly (No.2) as the Government gets a bloody nose for playing dirty with JSA claimants.
Both hefty legal matters this week so next week we will hopefully be being chatty on the subject of experts and looking at our postbag from the CPS, MoJ and Home Office. Doesn't look like fan mail....
Also, PLEASE RATE/REVIEW US: wherever you subscribe, please take two seconds as we start this series, to give us some stars and a few kind words. We'd be e'er so obliged. It helps us get up the search rankings, ya see.
In the light of the recent verdicts and sentence in Rolph Harris' case, Kirstin goes through the Sexual Offences Act 1956, looking at what offences are contained in it and how amendments have affected the law.
Given that we are on the subject of how the law changes over the years and that retrospective legislation is dangerous territory, we thought it would be worthwhile to take a peek at the decision of the High Court in Reilly (No.2) as the Government gets a bloody nose for playing dirty with JSA claimants.
Both hefty legal matters this week so next week we will hopefully be being chatty on the subject of experts and looking at our postbag from the CPS, MoJ and Home Office. Doesn't look like fan mail....
Also, PLEASE RATE/REVIEW US: wherever you subscribe, please take two seconds as we start this series, to give us some stars and a few kind words. We'd be e'er so obliged. It helps us get up the search rankings, ya see.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)